Proving Global Warming
At first opponents of global warming claimed that there was no warming. Then they agreed that there was warming but it was not anthropogenic, caused by human activity. Now they accept anthropogenic carbon dioxide is causing climate change, but they claim that it's not going to be as dire as climate scientists say it is going to be. I've posted about " dire consequences " for at least three years so it's not a new topic for me. It is possible that we may avoid the worst if we act now, but that isn't going to happen without people understanding what may happen if we don't. Thus it is important to raise the issue of how bad it could be in order to motivate our response to global warming. But that's not the point of this post. I would like to bring everyone's attention to an article which supports proof for global warming forcing deniers to admit it is happening leaving them with having to claim that it won't be so bad. This case is...